Late Adjunction and Minimalist Phrase Structure
نویسنده
چکیده
An algorithm of phrase structure building is proposed within the bare phrase structure framework. The algorithm is rooted in the idea that applications of Merge -the operation that combines syntactic objects -should not change the set of basic relations (in particular, c-command) in the existing structure, what Chomsky (2000) terms 'Least Tampering'. Under the proposed algorithm, this idea translates into a requirement that Merger must take place at the root of the tree/phrase marker when possible. As a result, the algorithm forces (basegenerated or moved) structural adjuncts to be Merged postcyclically. Three empirical consequences of the proposed algorithm are discussed: 1) constructions involving raising across the experiencer (e.g. John seems to Mary to be smart) are shown not to be problematic for the Minimal Link Condition (cf. Chomsky 1995b); 2) a novel account of the 'Adjunct Island' effects (Huang 1982) is proposed; 3) a principled analysis of 'approximative inversion' in Russian is offered.
منابع مشابه
The Timing of Adjunction
This paper proposes a combinatory algorithm of structure building within the bare phrase structure theory of the Minimalist program, which assumes operation Merge as the basic structure building device. The proposed algorithm enforces a particular timing of application of 'substitution' Merge and 'adjunction' Merge. In particular, I argue that XP adjuncts are Merged 'postcyclically' in overt sy...
متن کاملDisentangling Notions of Specifier Impenetrability: Late Adjunction, Islands, and Expressive Power
In this paper we investigate the weak generative capacity of minimalist grammars with late adjunction. We show that by viewing the Specifier Island Condition as the union of three separate constraints, we obtain a more nuanced perspective on previous results on constraint interaction in minimalist grammars, as well as the beginning of a map of the interaction between late adjunction and movemen...
متن کاملOrder and Optionality: Minimalist Grammars with Adjunction
Adjuncts are characteristically optional, but many, such as adverbs and adjectives, are strictly ordered. In Minimalist Grammars (MGs), it is straightforward to account for optionality or ordering, but not both. I present an extension of MGs, MGs with Adjunction, which accounts for optionality and ordering simply by keeping track of two pieces of information at once: the original category of th...
متن کاملMerge, Conflation, and Head Movement: the First Sister Principle Revisited
Head-movement is something of a conundrum in modern syntactic theory. At the beginning of the 1990s, it fit beautifully into the system of assumptions that were gradually coalescing into the Minimalist Program. The Head Movement Constraint of Travis 1984 was unified with other constraints on movement as an instance of Rizzi’s 1990:11 Relativized Minimality, the first overarching vision of how e...
متن کاملA Note on Countercyclicity and Minimalist Grammars
Minimalist grammars (MGs), as introduced in Stabler (1997), have proven a useful instrument in the formal analysis of syntactic theories developed within the minimalist branch of the principles–and–parameters framework (cf. Chomsky 1995, 2000). In fact, as shown in Michaelis (2001), MGs belong to the class of mildly context–sensitive grammars. Interestingly, without there being a rise in (at le...
متن کامل